Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrimavera, J. H.
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-22T05:51:20Z
dc.date.available2013-04-22T05:51:20Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationPrimavera, J. H. (1997). Fish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids: The role of structures and substrate. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 215(2), 205-216.en
dc.identifier.issn0022-0981
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10862/1596
dc.description.abstractThe effect of habitat structure and substratum on predation of the greasyback shrimp Metapenaeus ensis (De Haan), white shrimp Penaeus merguiensis De Man and tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon Fabricius by sea bass Lates calcarifer Bloch and mangrove snapper Lutjanus argentimaculatus (Forsskal) was evaluated. The shrimp juveniles measured 6–15 mm in carapace length; fish measured 6.5–12.5 cm in standard length; structure types were pneumatophores of the mangrove Sonneratia griffithii Kurz and dried coconut leaf bracts; structure densities were 0, 32 and 98 pneumatophores per tank; and sediment particle sizes were pebbles, sand-granules and silt–sand. Predation on shrimp was significantly higher in controls or bare sand (48.7%) than among pneumatophores (29.9%), but not among leaf bracts (43.5%). Shrimp mortality was also significantly higher on bare sand (72.9%) compared to medium-density (54.2%), but not high-density (68.8%), pneumatophores. Fish predation on the burying shrimp M. ensis was affected by predator type but not by sediment size. The generally higher predation rates of snapper may be due to their habit of leaving unconsumed pieces of shrimp, whereas sea bass which devour whole prey require fewer shrimp to reach satiation. Moreover, the presence of structures did not affect sea bass behaviour of chasing prey among pneumatophores and under leaf bracts, but reduced predation by the relatively passive snapper. Predation rates among pneumatophores vs. control, and among medium-density pneumatophores vs. bare sand, were lower for P. monodon but not P. merguiensis. This may be related to the greater and more frequent use of (laboratory) shelters by juvenile tiger shrimp compared to white shrimp. The results demonstrate that the effective provision of shelter depends not only on structure type and density but on the behaviour of predator and prey as well. The use of mangrove structures (pneumatophores) by juvenile shrimp as refuge from predation is also documented for the first time.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectLates calcariferen
dc.subjectLutjanus argentimaculatusen
dc.subjectMetapenaeus ensisen
dc.subjectPenaeus monodonen
dc.subjectSouth East Asiaen
dc.titleFish predation on mangrove-associated penaeids: The role of structures and substrateen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00046-4
dc.citation.volume215
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage205
dc.citation.epage216
dc.citation.journalTitleJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecologyen
seafdecaqd.library.callnumberVF SJ 0547
seafdecaqd.databank.controlnumber1997-17
dc.subject.asfaecological associationsen
dc.subject.asfafeeding behaviouren
dc.subject.asfamangrove swampsen
dc.subject.asfamarine crustaceansen
dc.subject.asfamarine fishen
dc.subject.asfapredationen
dc.subject.asfaprotective behaviouren
dc.subject.asfasheltered habitatsen
dc.subject.asfasubstrate preferencesen
dc.subject.asfarefugesen
dc.subject.asfasheltersen
dc.subject.scientificNamePenaeus monodonen
dc.subject.scientificNameSonneratia griffithiien
dc.subject.scientificNameLates calcariferen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal Articles [1229]
    These papers were contributed by Department staff to various national and international journals.

Show simple item record