Water quality and holding capacity of intensive and semi-intensive milkfish (Chanos chanos) ponds
MetadataShow full item record
Cited times in Scopus
This study determined the holding capacity of semi-intensive and intensive milkfish ponds and water quality in relation to fish biomass and feed input. Six units of 1000 m2 brackishwater ponds were used, three ponds for intensive system (20,000 fish ha−1) and three for semi-intensive system (8000 fish ha−1). Average production was significantly higher in intensive pond (3652 kg ha−1) than in semi-intensive pond (1352 kg ha−1) after a desired marketable size of fish was reached. Highest concentrations in effluents (mg l−1) of rearing water measured every 2 weeks were 0.369 and 0.289 for chlorophyll a (chl a), 0.485 and 0.512 for PO4–P, 0.279 and 0.811 for TAN, 0.094 and 0.082 for NO2–N, and 14.040 and 8.649 for NO3–N, 216 and 142 for total suspended solids (TSS), 15.0 and 21.7 for biological oxygen demand (BOD), in intensive and semi-intensive ponds, respectively. Lowest morning dissolved oxygen (DO) in intensive pond was 2.2 mg l−1, and did not decrease further because of aeration. In unaerated, semi-intensive pond, morning DO ranged from 1.3 to 5.0 mg l−1 but occasionally went below 1.0 mg l−1 resulting to fish mortalities at biomass of 835, 1206, and 1489 kg ha−1. Levels of NO3–N and dissolved inorganic N are linear functions of fish biomass or feed input in all systems (P<0.05). The buildup of nutrients is more pronounced at biomass of 1610 kg ha−1 and above while nutrient transformation (conversion of PO4–P or TAN to phytoplankton or vice versa) is apparent at biomass below 1419 kg ha−1. The holding capacity of unaerated, semi-intensive pond is below 1348 kg ha−1 or 54 kg feed ha−1 day−1 based on DO concentration of less than 1.0 mg l−1. However, the holding capacity can be lower than 835 kg ha−1 or 33 kg feed ha−1 day−1 during very calm weather or during rainy days when water column is stratified. Based on the results of regression analysis, the holding capacity of intensive pond should be set below 5107 kg ha−1 or 110 kg feed ha−1 day−1 so as not to exceed the acceptable levels for water quality variables in effluent waters.
CitationSumagaysay-Chavoso, N. S., & San Diego-McGlone, M. L. (2003). Water quality and holding capacity of intensive and semi-intensive milkfish (Chanos chanos) ponds.
This work was financed by SEAFDEC/AQD. The authors would like to thank the Centralized Analytical Laboratory of SEAFDEC/AQD for some of the water, and feed analysis, Gwen Anuevo for the assistance, and Mila Castaños for editing the draft of the manuscript.
- Journal Articles 
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Intensive culture of milkfish Chanos chanos in polyculture with white shrimp Penaeus indicus or mud crab Scylla serrata in brackishwater earthen ponds GS Jamerlan, RM Coloso & NV Golez - 2014 - Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center
Series: Aquaculture extension manual; No. 57A 30-page extension manual describing the biology, site selection, pond management and harvest & post-harvest of milkfish intensive polyculture in earthen pond.
ArticleThree color morphotypes of Kappaphycus alvarezii var. adik-adik (brown, green and red) collected from a farming area in Tictauan Is., Zamboanga City, Philippines were used as explants in the study in order to micropropagate ‘new’ plants. Individual sections of sterile Kappaphycus alvarezii var. adik-adik, initially cultured in a 48-well culture plate containing ESS/2 + E3 + PGR, released callus cells after 4–5 days of incubation at 23–25°C, 13:11H LD cycle and 10–15 μmol photons m−2 s−1 light intensity. True calli were formed after 29–35 days following dense formation of filaments or undifferentiated round cells at the medullary and inner cortical layers of the section. Plantlets (2–3 mm long) of Kappaphycus alvarezii var. adik-adik were able to regenerate after 98, 150 and 177 days in-vitro among the reds, greens, and browns, respectively. This study established successful methods for the production and regeneration of tissue explants of Kappaphycus alvarezii var. adik-adik which can possibly be used to mass produce ‘new’ cultivars for land- and sea-based nurseries as sources for commercial farming.
Conference paperS Mohamed, G Nagaraj, FHC Chua & YG Wang - In JR Arthur, CR Lavilla-Pitogo & RP Subasinghe (Eds.), Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture in Asia : Proceedings of the Meeting on the Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture in Asia 20-22 May 1996, Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines, 2000 - Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development CenterAquaculture is an increasingly important force in both the Malaysian as well as the Singaporean economies. In recent years, Singapore has focused on the aquarium fish trade, making it one of the largest ornamental fish production and transhipment centers in the world. Similarly, the Malaysian aquaculture industry has made rapid strides in the last few years and is poised to become a major contributor to the national fish supply by the early part of the next century. A significant trend in both countries has been the growing intensification of culture systems to achieve higher production per unit area. This has led to a greater occurrence of disease, particularly among aquarium fish, shrimp and marine fish farms. To obviate and control these diseases, there has been a concurrent increase in the use of chemotherapeutants. The three major groups of commonly used chemotherapeutants are: topical disinfectants, antimicrobials and probiotics. There is a wide range of topical disinfectants used by aquafarmers. The most common of these include lime, teaseed cake, formalin, benzalkonium chloride, acriflavine, malachite green, hypochlorite and poly-vinyl pyrrolidine. Of these, lime and teaseed cake are used exclusively in ponds, and acriflavine and malachite green only in hatcheries, while the others are used in both systems. Antimicrobials being used include sulfonamides, tetracyclines, nitrofurans, chloramphenicol, oxolinic acid and virginiamycin. A number of other chemotherapeutants are also used, albeit on a limited basis. The current concerns surrounding the use of chemotherapeutants and the legislative framework surrounding their sale and distribution are also discussed.