Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAltamirano, Jon P.
dc.contributor.authorRecente, Charlemagne P.
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez Jr., Jesus C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-14T06:27:45Z
dc.date.available2017-09-14T06:27:45Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationAltamirano, J. P., Recente, C. P., & Rodriguez Jr., J. C. (2017). Substrate preference for burying and feeding of sandfish Holothuria scabra juveniles. Fisheries Research, 186, 514-523.en
dc.identifier.issn0165-7836
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10862/3222
dc.description.abstractSubstrate preference for both burying and feeding of sandfish Holothuria scabra juveniles (3–6 g wet body weight) and their associated daily behavior, growth and survival were investigated in laboratory and field experiments using different coastal substrate types (silty mud, sandy mud, and coarse sand) to determine the ideal habitat for potential grow-out culture, sea ranching or stock enhancement of this important sea cucumber species. During the peak hours of burying (03:00–09:00 h) and feeding (15:00–03:00 h), a significantly greater number of sandfish juveniles preferred to bury in (28.3%) and feed on (21.5%) sandy mud, typical of intertidal coastal sand flats. Silty mud was the least preferred substrate for feeding (13.5%) and burying (13.8%). Burying and feeding preferences of sandfish juveniles were not significantly influenced by the presence of seagrass (Thalassia hemprichii) on coarse sand. Growth of sandfish juveniles in the first two weeks of rearing in tanks was significantly greater on coarse sand (growth rate: 0.59 g d−1 or 7.0% d−1), followed by sandy mud (0.34 g d−1 or 4.72% d−1) while OM content of these sediments remain almost unchanged. On silty mud, sandfish juveniles constantly shrunk (−0.02 g d−1 or −0.63% d−1) for 8 weeks while sediment OM content increased. In the field, silty mud substrate of a mangrove pond caused total mortality of sandfish within two weeks, while sandy mud substrate of a sand flat provided significantly higher growth than the control (no sediment), but not significantly different than coarse sand of a seagrass bed. Sandy mud to coarse sand substrates of intertidal sand flats were most preferred by sandfish juveniles while silty mud associated with muddy mangroves and culture ponds seems to be unsuitable that sandfish would opt to avoid. Our results will contribute to the selection of suitable sites for sandfish sea ranching and stock enhancement in coastal areas.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Australian Centre for International Agriculture Research (ACIAR) through the project FIS/2010/042 “Expansion and Diversification of Production and Management Systems for Sea Cucumbers in the Philippines, Vietnam and northern Australia”. In-house support was provided by SEAFDEC/AQD through studies FS-10-Y2010T and BR-03-Y2011T. Special thanks to M.R. Banaticla-Altamirano for improving this manuscript and to the reviewers and editors for the constructive comments. We also appreciate the assistance of H. Figurado in monitoring in the lab and at the field.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectHolothuria scabra
dc.subjectSea cucumber cultureen
dc.subjectDaily behavioren
dc.subjectOrganic matteren
dc.subjectSediment compositionen
dc.subjectAlgal biofilmen
dc.titleSubstrate preference for burying and feeding of sandfish Holothuria scabra juvenilesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fishres.2016.08.011
dc.citation.volume186
dc.citation.spage514
dc.citation.epage523
dc.citation.journalTitleFisheries Researchen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record