Ecological considerations in milkfish farming in marine pens and cages in the Philippines
- Global styles
- MLA
- Vancouver
- Elsevier - Harvard
- APA
- Help

View/ Open
Date
1998Author
Page views
4,197ASFA keyword
AGROVOC keyword
Taxonomic term
Metadata
Show full item record
Share
Abstract
Milkfish farming in the Philippines has a long history and great importance, being widely regarded as the way to domestic food security. But the industry has faced new challenges in the past decade, with the advent of many other farmed aquatic species, mostly cash crops and "export winners," and with the increased pressure to intensify production in brackishwater ponds and in marine pens and cages. There are no up-to-date government statistics on the area and production of marine pens and cages, but industry insiders estimate a yearly production of about 25,000 mt of sea-grown milkfish in 1996 - 1998, mostly from Pangasinan, but also from Quezon, Davao, Cebu, Bohol, Panay, Samar, and Negros. High yields (2 -38 kg/m3) were made possible by very high stocking rates (3 -75 fingerlings/m3) and feeding rates (2-4 kg feed per kg of fish). The high production costs and the pollution from feed wastes and fish metabolites have stopped most operations within 1 - 2 years. This paper examines the trends and problems in milkfish farming in marine pens and cages, and discusses the ecological limits and the projected ecological footprint of this farming system. Milkfish farming in marine pens and cages, as presently practised, is not the magic solution to the fish deficit in the Philippines and is not an appropriate technology to promote on a wide scale. The required investment is enormous. Properly made pens and cages set up in suitable clean-water locations cost much. The ability of milkfish to ensure domestic food security is negated by the use of fishmeal-based feeds. Fish feeds use up fish meal and other fisheries and agriculture products used by people and other sectors. If marine pens and cages must be promoted, integrated coastal area management, an informed precautionary approach, better infrastructure, and improved feeding management are important to ensure sustainability.
Suggested Citation
Bagarinao, T. (1998). Ecological considerations in milkfish farming in marine pens and cages in the Philippines. UPV Journal of Natural Sciences , 3(1), 67-82. http://hdl.handle.net/10862/1756
Type
ArticleISSN
0118-461XCollections
- Journal Articles [1266]
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Series: Aquaculture extension manual; No. 25
The modular method: Milkfish pond culture
Baliao, Dan D.; de los Santos, Miguel A.; Franco, Nilo M. (Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 1999)The modular method of milkfish culture (Chanos chanos) described in the manual is an improvement over the traditional extensive method. The manual is intended for the use of fish farmers and aquaculturists, extensionists, and students of aquaculture not only in the Philippines, but also in other milkfish-producing countries in Southeast Asia and the world. It covers the following: Interesting facts about milkfish -- biological characteristics, artificial breeding of milkfish; Design and operation of modular pond system -- pond preparation, stocking in the nursery or transition ponds, stocking in the rearing ponds, care of stock, pond utilization and production schedule, harvest and post-harvest; and, Economics and costing. -
Evaluation of organic and inorganic fertilizers in brackishwater milkfish ponds
Bombeo-Tuburan, Isidra; Agbayani, Renato F.; Subosa, Precilla F. (Elsevier, 1989)The study was conducted in twelve 144-m2 ponds to evaluate the effect of different organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth, survival, gross production, and profitability of marketable milkfish. The following treatments were used: Treatment I, SEAFDEC traditional fertilization practice (16-20-0 at 50 kg/ha and 45-0-0 at 15 kg/ha); Treatment II, half-dosage of Treatment I; Treatment III, chicken manure at 0.5 ton/ha; and Treatment IV, MASA (processed from agricultural and industrial wastes) fertilizer at 0.5 ton/ha. All treatments were applied once in every 2 weeks. No significant difference (P > 0.05) existed in the harvest and production of milkfish among the treatments. However, economic indicators such as return-on-investment (ROI), payback period, and marginal analysis ranked the performance of the fertilizer treatments in the order of I, II, III and IV. Fish kills occurred in three ponds applied with chicken manure and MASA fertilizer. This could have been due to a heavy build-up of organic matter in the pond bottom which led to the collapse of the benthic algal community, depletion of dissolved oxygen and the presence of hydrogen sulfide. It is therefore suggested that a lower dosage of organic fertilizer should be applied in ponds especially during the rainy season. -
Milkfish breeding and hatchery technology at SEAFDEC/AQD
Unknown author (Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 1999)Describes the techniques already adopted by the private sector: broodstock management, broodstock diet, commercial fry production, live transport, and larval diet. A list of AQD research publications on milkfish is included.






