Experiments on the induced breeding of milkfish, Chanos chanos (Forsskal) in 1978
- Global styles
- MLA
- Vancouver
- Elsevier - Harvard
- APA
- Help
Share
Abstract
Results indicated that a female having eggs with an average diameter of < 0.7 mm did not respond well to the hormone injections.
Suggested Citation
Juario, J. V., Natividad, M., Almendras, J., Nacario, J., & Canto Jr., J. (1978). Experiments on the induced breeding of milkfish, Chanos chanos (Forsskal) in 1978. SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department Quarterly Research Report , 2(4), 1-3. http://hdl.handle.net/10862/2331
Type
ArticleCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Changes in length and weight of milkfish fry preserved in formalin
Kumagai, Shigeru; Castillo, Nelson (Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 1978)Fry shrank immediately after they were preserved in formalin, but from the second week onwards shrinkage was almost nil. Fry in freshwater formalin solutions shrunk less than those in seawater formalin solutions. It is ... -
Milkfish fry occurrence pattern in two localities along the Western Coast of Panay Island
Kumagai, Shigeru; Bañada, Vicente C.; Castillo, Nelson M.; Unggui, Abdul S. (Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 1978)The results are presented of a study of milkfish fry occurrence in the Philippines, namely at Magaba and at Tubog. There were 2 peaks of fry occurrence in the latter, one in May and another in October, whereas only one ... -
The economics of the milkfish fry and fingerling industry of the Philippines
Smith, Ian R. (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management; Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 1981)The fry and fingerling industry of the milkfish (Chanos chanos Forskal) in the Philippines is alleged to suffer from certain imperfections. Primary among these are an annual shortage of catch necessary to meet the stocking ...Series: ICLARM technical reports; 1 | SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department contribution; No. 93