SEAFDEC/AQDINSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY
    • English
    • 日本語
    • ไทย
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • English 
    • English
    • 日本語
    • ไทย
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • Login
View Item 
  •   SEAFDEC/AQD Institutional Repository Home
  • 03 SEAFDEC/AQD External Publications
  • Journal Articles, Conference Papers and Book Chapters by SEAFDEC Staff
  • Books and Book Chapters
  • View Item
  •   SEAFDEC/AQD Institutional Repository Home
  • 03 SEAFDEC/AQD External Publications
  • Journal Articles, Conference Papers and Book Chapters by SEAFDEC Staff
  • Books and Book Chapters
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Alternative feeding strategies to improve milkfish production efficiency in the Philippines

  • Global styles
  • MLA
  • Vancouver
  • Elsevier - Harvard
  • APA
  • Help
Thumbnail
Download URL
aquafishcrsp.oregonstate.edu
Date
2010
Author
de Jesus-Ayson, Evelyn Grace T.
Borski, Russel J.
Page views
5,910
ASFA keyword
feeding experiments ASFA
feeding ASFA
milkfish culture ASFA
aquaculture ASFA
biomass ASFA
growth ASFA
body weight ASFA
AGROVOC keyword
milkfish AGROVOC
Philippines AGROVOC
Metadata
Show full item record

Share 
 
Abstract
In the Philippines, cage culture of milkfish in marine environments is increasing. The practice uses high stocking densities, with significantly greater inputs of artificial feeds which more often than not, has led to excessive feeding and consequently excessive nutrient loading in receiving waters, exacerbating problems with pollution. These could have contributed to occurrence of periodic fish kills in areas of marine milkfish culture clusters. Sixty percent of milkfish farming expenses are attributable to feed costs. A series of experiments were conducted in an attempt to develop alternative feeding strategies that will reduce feed inputs without compromising growth and resulting production. In the first experiment, growth was compared in milkfish fed daily, on alternate days and on alternate 2-week or 4-week starvation and refeeding cycles in a tank environment provided with flow-through water system. Results show, that milkfish fed on alternate days do not grow as well as milkfish that are fed daily. Feed restriction for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks of refeeding elicited a compensatory growth response such that average body weight (ABW) of fish was not significantly different from ABW of fish fed daily. Another experiment compared growth of fish given a ration equivalent to 10% of BW (usual practice) or 7.5% of BW. Results show no significant effect on growth or final ABW or biomass in fish fed daily or on 2-week cycles of feed restriction and refeeding. Thus, a lower feeding ration can be given to milkfish without compromising yield. Results of the tank experiments were verified in actual marine cage and brackishwater pond production systems using an initial feeding rate of 7.5% rather than 10% ABW. In the experiment in cages, survival rates between the control fish and the groups subjected to cycles of 2-week starvation followed by 2 weeks of normal feeding were comparable, except for one replicate of the starved-refed group where survival rate was very low (38.78%). After 3 cycles of starvation and refeeding, weight gain in the starved-refed groups were generally lower than in the control groups, which may suggest that small-sized fish cannot adapt very well to periodic starvation. In brackishwater ponds, growth, survival and total biomass at harvest was comparable between milkfish fed daily and those fed on alternate days. Hence, FCR was lower in the milkfish fed on alternate days compared to fish fed daily. On the other hand, survival was very low in fish subjected to 2 cycles of 2 weeks starvation followed by 4 weeks of normal feeding. These results suggest that as in tilapia, alternate day feeding can be adopted to milkfish culture in brackishwater ponds without compromising production while at the same time lowering production cost and environmental impact. Overall, these studies provide two practical strategies, reduced ration size and alternate day feeding, to improve production efficiency of milkfish, the largest finfish aquaculture industry in the Philippines.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10862/3551
Suggested Citation
de Jesus-Ayson, E. G. T., & Borski, R. J. (2010). Alternative feeding strategies to improve milkfish production efficiency in the Philippines. In Technical Reports: Investigations 2007-2009 (Vol. 1, pp. 79–96). Corvallis, Oregon, USA: AquaFish Collaborative Research Support Program, Oregon State University.
Type
Book chapter
Collections
  • Books and Book Chapters [123]

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    Ration reduction, integrated multitrophic aquaculture (milkfish-seaweed-sea cucumber) and value-added products to improve incomes and reduce the ecological footprint of milkfish culture in the Philippines 

    de Jesus-Ayson, Evelyn Grace T.; Borski, Russel J. (AquaFish Collaborative Research Support Program, Oregon State University, 2012)
    In the Philippines, cage culture of milkfish in marine environments is increasing. The practice uses high stocking densities, with significantly greater inputs of artificial feeds which more often than not, have led to excessive feeding and consequently excessive nutrient loading in receiving waters, exacerbating problems with pollution. These could have contributed to occurrence of periodic fish kills in areas of marine milkfish culture clusters. In marine cage culture, about 80% of variable expenses are attributable to feed costs. Experiments were conducted to compare production characteristics of milkfish fed on alternate days versus those raised on daily feeding in marine cage culture. Fish were fed either daily or every other day using a reduced feed ration at 7.5% of fish biomass at the start of culture down to 3% of fish biomass towards harvest. We showed this ration level was as effective as the industry standard that begins at a rate of 10% average body weight. Morevover, we had previously found that milkfish reared in brackishwater ponds on an alternate day feeding scheme using the reduced ration level produced a 56% cost savings in feed with little impact on total yield relative to fish raised on a daily feeding protocol. In the present study, survival rates (~ 90%) were comparable between the control fish fed daily and groups fed on alternate days in marine cages. Similarly, total harvested biomass of fish in the alternate day and daily feeding groups was similar as was the harvest value, although fish on the alternate day feeding scheme grew slightly less. The amount of feed and the corresponding cost of feeds consumed were significantly lower in stocks that were fed on alternate days compared with those fed daily (P < 0.05). Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was lower in the alternate-day fed group (FCR = 2.46) relative to stocks fed daily (FCR = 3.59). Overall, the results demonstrate that feed costs can be reduced by around 32% in stocks fed on alternate days, which yields an estimated 20-25% improvement in production efficiency relative to raising animals on a daily feeding protocol. Hence, a significant costs savings with reduced impact of nutrient loading in the environment is likely to be realized for farmers who adopt an alternate day feeding scheme in raising milkfish in marine cages.
  • Thumbnail
    Series: Milkfish Podcasts

    Milkfish aquaculture: Alternate-day feeding strategy for reducing cost of milkfish culture in brackishwater ponds and marine cages in the Philippines 

    Sayco, Roberto; de Jesus-Ayson, Evelyn Grace (AquaFish Collaborative Research Support Program (AquaFish CRSP), 2012-02-02)
    This podcast provides information on how an alternate-day feeding strategy can be used to reduce costs for culturing milkfish in ponds or marine cages.
  • Thumbnail

    Potential of feed pea (Pisum sativum) meal as a protein source in practical diets for milkfish (Chanos chanos Forsskal) 

    Borlongan, Ilda G.; Eusebio, Perla S.; Welsh, Tim (Elsevier, 2003)
    A 12-week feeding trial was conducted to evaluate the use of feed pea meal as a dietary protein source for juvenile milkfish. Six isonitrogenous (30% crude protein) and isocaloric (16.5 kJ/g) practical diets were formulated. The control diet contained fish meal, soybean meal, meat and bone meal and copra meal as principal protein sources. Feed pea meal was progressively substituted at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% of total protein. A leading commercial milkfish feed was also tested as an additional control. The experimental diets were fed to triplicate groups of milkfish fingerlings (mean initial weight of 0.42±0.01 g) at 10% body weight/day. Growth performance (expressed as percentage of weight gain and SGR), survival, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) of milkfish fed diets with up to 10% substitution of the dietary protein with feed pea meal were not significantly different (P>0.05) compared to fish fed the control diet. Replacement with feed pea meal at 15% and higher levels led to milkfish fed these diets showing a significantly lower growth response compared to fish fed with the control without any feed pea meal. Nevertheless, it was observed that milkfish fed diets with up to 20% of total dietary protein substitution with feed pea meal showed better growth rates and feed conversion ratios than the commercial feed control. Whole body composition (crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, nitrogen-free extracts and ash content) of milkfish fed the various test diets was not significantly different. Apparent digestibility coefficients of feed pea meal and experimental diets in milkfish were also determined. Results indicate that feed pea meal is an acceptable protein source and can replace up to 20% of the total dietary protein in milkfish diets.

© SEAFDEC/AQD  2026
Send Feedback | Subscribe
 

 

Browse

All of SAIRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

© SEAFDEC/AQD  2026
Send Feedback | Subscribe
 

 

Export citations

Export the current results of the search query as a citation list. Select one of the available citation styles, or add a new one using the "Citations format" option present in the "My account" section.

The list of citations that can be exported is limited to items.

Export citations

Export the current item as a citation. Select one of the available citation styles, or add a new one using the "Citations format" option present in the "My account" section.

Export Citations

EXTERNAL LINKS DISCLAIMER

This link is being provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only. SEAFDEC/AQD bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external site or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external site for answers to questions regarding its content.

If you come across any external links that don't work, we would be grateful if you could report them to the repository administrators.

Click DOWNLOAD to open/view the file. Contact us in case the link we provided don't work.

Download

DOCUMENT REQUEST NOT AVAILABLE

This publication is still available (in PRINT) and for sale at AQD bookstore. The library is currently restricted to send PDF of publications that are still for sale.

You may contact bookstore@seafdec.org.ph or visit AQD bookstore for orders.

FILE UNDER EMBARGO

This file associated with this publication is currently under embargo. This will be available for download after the embargo date.