Mangrove zooplankton of Matang mangrove estuaries: Preliminary assessment of spatio-temporal abundance in relation to environmental parameters
- Global styles
- MLA
- Vancouver
- Elsevier - Harvard
- APA
- Help
Share
Abstract
An on-going zooplankton study in the Matang mangrove swamp beginning April 2002 has shown that zooplankton wet biomasses determined over 5 months were relatively higher inside the mangrove swamp (1.17± 0.35 g m-3) than in adjacent offshore waters (0.87 ± 0.55 g m-3). Total zooplankton densities ranged from 1.2 x 104 - 5.82 x 104 individuals per m3 inside the swamp, whereas in offshore waters zooplankton densities ranged from 1.03 x 104 - 2.83 x 104 individuals per m3. Crustaceans, dominated by copepods and cirripede larvae, constituted more than 70%, followed by polychaetes and chaetognaths. Fish larvae made up less than 0.5% of the total densities. Preliminary PCA of 50 zooplankton taxa suggests that the swamp taxa but not (so much) the offshore taxa differed spatio-temporally, and that more fish larvae and young copepods were caught inside the swamp. The larval fish density (surface hauls) ranged from 12-669 individuals per 100 m-3 inside the swamp, whereas in offshore waters it ranged from 21-290 individuals per 100 m-3. The major families of fish larvae were Engraulididae (ca. 60%) and Gobiidae (ca. 30%). Engraulid larvae were ubiquitous in distribution occurring from swamp to 14 km offshore, while gobiid larvae were more restricted to the swamp. Other families identified included the Scatophagidae, Ambassidae, Blennidae, Sciaenidae, Cynoglossidae, Scorpaenidae, Carangidae and Syngnathidae. Preliminary CCA suggests that salinity, turbidity and zooplankton size and abundance may be important factors regulating the distribution and abundance of fish larvae. However, its interpretation is cautioned due to the limited data. A larger data set is needed to correlate larval fish abundance with the environmental factors.
Suggested Citation
Chong, V. C., Ooi, A. L., Chew, L. L., & Ogawa, Y. (2003). Mangrove zooplankton of Matang mangrove estuaries: Preliminary assessment of spatio-temporal abundance in relation to environmental parameters. In Y. Ogawa, H. Y. Ogata, Y. Maeno, T. Shimoda, Y. Fujioka, & Y. Fukuda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop of the JIRCAS International Collaborative Research: Studies on Sustainable Production Systems of Aquatic Animals in Brackish Mangrove Areas , December 2-3, 2002, Penang, Malaysia (pp. 21-43). Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences.
Type
Conference paperISSN
1341-710XSeries
JIRCAS Working Report;No. 35
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mangroves as nurseries: Shrimp populations in mangrove and non-mangrove habitats
Primavera, J. H. (Elsevier, 1998)A total of 4845 penaeids belonging to nine species—Metapenaeus anchistus, M. ensis, M. moyebi, M. philippinensis, Penaeus merguiensis, P. monodon, P. semisulcatus, P. latisulcatus and Metapenaeopsis palmensis—were collected by pocket seine monthly over 13 months from mangrove and non-mangrove sites in Guimaras, Philippines. The restricted distribution of the three dominant species—M. ensisandP. merguiensisto the brackish water riverine mangrove, andM. anchistusto the high-salinity island mangrove and tidal flat—is probably related to different salinity and substrate preferences. Abundance and size composition of the major species suggest a strong nursery role for the riverine mangrove (high juvenile densities, relatively small sizes year-round), limited nursery use of the island mangrove (fewer shrimps, larger size ranges, presence of maturing females) and a non-nursery use (e.g. foraging) in the tidal flat. Penaeid recruitment to the river had two peaks in November and May when the average salinity was ∼20 (Practical Salinity Scale) and water temperatures were high (30–31 °C). The spatio-temporal pattern of penaeid species in Guimaras shows partitioning across habitats and seasonal recruitment influenced by physical and biological factors. -
Mangrove-Friendly Aquaculture : Proceedings of the Workshop on Mangrove-Friendly Aquaculture organized by the SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department, January 11-15, 1999, Iloilo City, Philippines
Primavera, Jurgenne H.; Garcia, Luis Ma. B.; Castaños, Milagros T.; Surtida, Marilyn B. (Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 2000)The proceedings have three review papers on the mangroves of Southeast Asia, silvofisheries, and Indonesia's integrated mangrove forest and aquaculture systems. The rest of the papers, all on mangrove-friendly aquaculture efforts are from the Philippines, Japan, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, and Cambodia. All the countries represented had varied methodologies, with Cambodia in its initial stages while some countries like Indonesia and Thailand have tested methodologies. The proceedings include a tabulation of the reported mangrove-friendly technology by country -- e.g. silvofisheries in ponds (mangrove and fish/shrimp/mudcrab) and pens (mangrove and mudcrab). The workshop recommendations are classified into three major topics: problems associated with mangroves, problems associated with aquaculture practices, and socioeconomic and cultural issues. -
Retaining our mangrove greenbelt: Integrating mangroves and aquaculture
Although multilateral agencies in Southeast Asia have long been promoting that mangroves, and other wetlands, are wastelands to be put into better use, such as conversion to ponds. However, there is a need for Mangrove Friendly Aquaculture (MFA) technology in the intertidal forest, or swamp, which does not require the clearing of trees. MFA may be defined on 2 levels: 1) silvofisheries or aquasilviculture, where the low density culture of crabs, shrimps and fish is integrated with mangroves; and, 2) mangrove filters where mangrove forests are used to absorb the excess nutrients in the effluents from high-density culture ponds. A review is made of MFA practices belonging to the first category. Discussion is on a country basis, moving from traditional systems in Indonesia, to the introduced technologies in Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia. It is hoped that this review will be of use to scientists, aquaculturists, policy makers and governmental/NGOs interested in making aquaculture more ecologically sound and socially responsible.






