SEAFDEC/AQDINSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY
    • English
    • 日本語
    • ไทย
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • English 
    • English
    • 日本語
    • ไทย
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • Login
View Item 
  •   SEAFDEC/AQD Institutional Repository Home
  • 01 SEAFDEC/AQD Publications
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Proceedings of the International Workshop on Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA)
  • View Item
  •   SEAFDEC/AQD Institutional Repository Home
  • 01 SEAFDEC/AQD Publications
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Proceedings of the International Workshop on Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Inland fisheries resource enhancement and conservation practices in Myanmar

  • Global styles
  • MLA
  • Vancouver
  • Elsevier - Harvard
  • APA
  • Help
Thumbnail
View/Open
TheinH2015.pdf (161.9Kb) Open Access
Downloads: 1,785
Date
2015
Author
Thein, Htun
Page views
2,902
ASFA keyword
inland waters ASFA
policies ASFA
stocking (organisms) ASFA
sustainable fishing ASFA
fishery management ASFA
resource conservation ASFA
inland fisheries ASFA
fishery organizations ASFA
sustainable development ASFA
fishery regulations ASFA
inland water environment ASFA
sustainability ASFA
AGROVOC keyword
Seed replenishment program
Myanmar AGROVOC
Metadata
Show full item record

Share 
 
Abstract
Myanmar has impressive freshwater capture fisheries. Inland freshwater bodies cover 8.1 million ha of which 1.3 million ha are permanent while the rest are seasonally inundated floodplains. There are repeated references to the crucial importance of fish and fish products in the nutrition of the Myanmar people. Over the past few decades, inland fisheries resources have increased pressure from overfishing, use of destructive fishing gear/methods, pollution and environment changes. In order to make a sustainable inland capture fisheries and conservation of aquatic biodiversity as well as nutritional security and improved rural livelihoods, fisheries resource enhancement and conservation measures have long been adopted in Myanmar since 1967, initiated through a seed replenishment program in natural waters, such rivers, lake, dams, even rice fields, etc. However, the institutional, policy, legislative and financial environments under which enhancement and capture fisheries regimes exist are not conducive to the interests of the fishers. Strong tools for valuation of ecosystem goods and services, enabling governance arrangements and estimation of environmental flows are needed. Fishing communities need to be organized into strong co-management/participatory/community regimes in order to ensure that all stakeholders take part in decision-making process and the benefits accrued are shared equitably by all.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10862/2764
Suggested Citation
Thein, H. (2015). Inland fisheries resource enhancement and conservation practices in Myanmar. In M. R. R. Romana-Eguia, F. D. Parado-Estepa, N. D. Salayo, & M. J. H. Lebata-Ramos (Eds.), Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia: Challenges in Responsible Production of Aquatic Species: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA) (pp. 67-75). Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines: Aquaculture Dept., Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center.
Type
Conference paper
ISBN
9789719931041
Collections
  • Proceedings of the International Workshop on Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA) [56]

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    Knowing Asian aquaculture and fisheries 

    Surtida, Marilyn B. (Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 1998-04)
    This article is the second of four parts.
  • Thumbnail

    Country status on sustainable aquaculture in Lao PDR 

    Khonglaliane, Thongkhoun (Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 2015)
    Capture fisheries and aquaculture in Lao PDR are based on water resource ecosystems which consist mainly of rivers and streams, hydropower and irrigation reservoirs, diversion weirs, small water bodies, flood plains and wet-season rice-fields. The total area of water resources for capture fisheries is believed to be more than 1.2 million ha. The estimated consumption of inland fish in Lao PDR is approximately 167,922 tonnes per year while consumption of other aquatic animals is estimated at 40,581 tonnes per year. Most of the consumption is from internal production (i.e. imports are of minor importance), so these figures represent approximate catches or yield from fisheries. These estimated yields are conservatively valued at almost US$150 million per year. The people of Lao PDR, especially in the rural communities that account for more than 75 per cent of the population, still depend upon the country's fish and other aquatic animals as their most reliable sources of animal protein. The estimate of actual fish consumption per capita (kg/capita/ year) of inland fish is 24.5 kg, while other aquatic animals account for about 4.1 kg and marine products around 0.4 kg, to make a total of 29 kg of fish and aquatic products consumed per capita per year. As aquaculture in Lao PDR expands, many forms of production systems are being developed, for example pond culture, communal ponds, rice-cum-fish culture and cage culture. Most fish culture systems in Lao PDR are small-scale. Such forms of production systems are divided into sub-categories depending on the nature and main activity of the producers. According to the Department of Livestock and Fisheries, aquaculture production in 2007 accounted for 54,750 tonnes in an area of more than 42,000 ha, including cage culture in the Mekong and some tributaries. There has been a significant increase in intensive tilapia production in recent years in Lao PDR (MRC Technical Paper No. 5 April 2002) based on tilapia cage culture in the Mekong river and irrigation reservoirs. In last two years, an enterprising farmer has established about 360 cages. Constraints in the large-scale development of tilapia cage culture are the lack of technical support (e.g. extension services) to the farmers and insufficient supply of advanced fingerlings. Morever, tilapia cage culture in the Mekong river system is perceived to be difficult to sustain because of environmental factors such as river flooding and strong currents during the rainy season and the lack of water during the dry season.
  • Thumbnail

    Strategies for sustainable use of living aquatic resources 

    Carreon-Lagoc, Julia; Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department (Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 1994)

© SEAFDEC/AQD  2026
Send Feedback | Subscribe
 

 

Browse

All of SAIRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

© SEAFDEC/AQD  2026
Send Feedback | Subscribe
 

 

Export citations

Export the current results of the search query as a citation list. Select one of the available citation styles, or add a new one using the "Citations format" option present in the "My account" section.

The list of citations that can be exported is limited to items.

Export citations

Export the current item as a citation. Select one of the available citation styles, or add a new one using the "Citations format" option present in the "My account" section.

Export Citations

DOCUMENT REQUEST NOT AVAILABLE

This publication is still available (in PRINT) and for sale at AQD bookstore. The library is currently restricted to send PDF of publications that are still for sale.

You may contact bookstore@seafdec.org.ph or visit AQD bookstore for orders.

FILE UNDER EMBARGO

This file associated with this publication is currently under embargo. This will be available for download after the embargo date.