Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMateo, Jonalyn P.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Iona
dc.contributor.authorCottier-Cook, Elizabeth J.
dc.contributor.authorLuhan, Maria Rovilla J.
dc.contributor.authorFerriols, Victor Marco Emmanuel N.
dc.contributor.authorHurtado, Anicia Q.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-18T01:57:44Z
dc.date.available2020-03-18T01:57:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-10
dc.identifier.citationMateo, J. P., Campbell, I., Cottier-Cook, E. J., Luhan, M. R. J., Ferriols, V. M. E. N., & Hurtado, A. Q. (2020). Analysis of biosecurity-related policies governing the seaweed industry of the Philippines. Journal of Applied Phycology, 32, 2009-2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02083-7en
dc.identifier.issn1573-5176
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10862/3586
dc.description.abstractThe seaweed industry in the Philippines is a significant contributor to aquaculture production, both nationally and internationally. It out-produces the capture fisheries sector and most global producers, with the exception of China and Indonesia. Seaweed species, particularly Kappaphycus and Eucheuma spp., have been farmed throughout the country since the early 1970s. In 2017, the Philippines produced 1.4 million tonnes (fwt) and exported 35,490 tonnes of seaweed and carrageenan with a value of US$174 million. However, a decreasing trend in seaweed production has been observed since the mid-2000s as a result of pest and disease outbreaks, among other factors, which have been exacerbated by climate change. This paper is the first to analyze biosecurity-related national policies and legislation (a.k.a. ‘frameworks’ collectively), which are relevant to the seaweed industry in the Philippines. A total of 12 frameworks were identified, of which a sub-set of seven were compared using defined biosecurity themes, risks, and management measures to evaluate how seaweed biosecurity is incorporated into national policy. The inclusion of biosecurity-related activities in national frameworks was found to be limited to aquatic animal commodities or agricultural crops. Only the Code of Good Aquaculture Practices (GAqP) for seaweed specifically included seaweed cultivation, however, it did not include any biosecurity measures. The results indicated a clear gap in current biosecurity legislation and policy in the Philippines, which if addressed have the potential to reduce the impact of endemic and emergent diseases and pests and support the sustainable growth of this important industry.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag
dc.subjectEucheumaen
dc.titleAnalysis of biosecurity-related policies governing the seaweed industry of the Philippinesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10811-020-02083-7
dc.citation.volume32en
dc.citation.spage2009en
dc.citation.epage2022en
dc.citation.journalTitleJournal of Applied Phycologyen
dc.subject.asfabiosecurityen
dc.subject.asfapoliciesen
dc.subject.asfaseaweed industryen
dc.subject.asfaseaweedsen
dc.subject.scientificNameKappaphycus


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journal Articles [1222]
    These papers were contributed by Department staff to various national and international journals.

Show simple item record